Tato práce se zabývá analýzou indikátorů e-governmentu a digitální společnosti v zemích EU. Nejdříve je popsána problematika ICT a podmínky pro rozvoj digitálních společností ve veřejné správě. Následují definice e-governmentu a digitální společnosti, a především popis existujících indexů, pořadí a zpráv hodnotících tyto oblasti. Po porovnání vybraných indexů a souvisejících indikátorů a jejich struktury a vývoje jsou provedeny statistická a shluková analýza získaných dat pro EGDI a DESI v zemích EU.
Anotace v angličtině
This thesis deals with the analysis of indicators of e-government and digital society in the EU countries. First, the ICT topic and the conditions for the development of digital societies in the public administration context are described. The following are definitions of e-government and digital society, and above all a description of existing indices, rankings, and reports evaluating these areas. After comparing selected indices and related indicators and their structure and development, statistical and cluster analyses of the data for the EGDI and DESI in the EU countries are performed.
e-government, digital society, development, indicators, comparison, cluster analysis
Rozsah průvodní práce
66 pp.
Jazyk
AN
Anotace
Tato práce se zabývá analýzou indikátorů e-governmentu a digitální společnosti v zemích EU. Nejdříve je popsána problematika ICT a podmínky pro rozvoj digitálních společností ve veřejné správě. Následují definice e-governmentu a digitální společnosti, a především popis existujících indexů, pořadí a zpráv hodnotících tyto oblasti. Po porovnání vybraných indexů a souvisejících indikátorů a jejich struktury a vývoje jsou provedeny statistická a shluková analýza získaných dat pro EGDI a DESI v zemích EU.
Anotace v angličtině
This thesis deals with the analysis of indicators of e-government and digital society in the EU countries. First, the ICT topic and the conditions for the development of digital societies in the public administration context are described. The following are definitions of e-government and digital society, and above all a description of existing indices, rankings, and reports evaluating these areas. After comparing selected indices and related indicators and their structure and development, statistical and cluster analyses of the data for the EGDI and DESI in the EU countries are performed.
e-government, digital society, development, indicators, comparison, cluster analysis
Zásady pro vypracování
The aim of the thesis is to analyse e-government and digital society indicators in selected countries. Outline: - Reference to the theoretical background of the subject matter - Definition and development of the terms e-government and digital society - Identification and comparison of relevant indicators - Analysis of indicators in selected countries - Results and discussion
Zásady pro vypracování
The aim of the thesis is to analyse e-government and digital society indicators in selected countries. Outline: - Reference to the theoretical background of the subject matter - Definition and development of the terms e-government and digital society - Identification and comparison of relevant indicators - Analysis of indicators in selected countries - Results and discussion
Seznam doporučené literatury
Dwivedi, Y.K., Wade, M.R., & Schneberger, S.L. (Eds.). (2011). Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Springer. ISBN 9781441961082. Falk, S., Römmele, A., & Silverman, M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital Government: Leveraging Innovation to Improve Public Sector Performance and Outcomes for Citizens. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-38795-6. Chen, H. et al. (Eds.). (2007). Digital government: E-government research, case studies, and implementation, Vol. 17. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-71611-4. Nardo, M. et al. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. ISBN 978-92-64-04345-9. Perriam, J., & Carter, S. (Eds.). (2021). Understanding Digital Societies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. ISBN 978-1-5297-3387-7.
Seznam doporučené literatury
Dwivedi, Y.K., Wade, M.R., & Schneberger, S.L. (Eds.). (2011). Information Systems Theory: Explaining and Predicting Our Digital Society, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Springer. ISBN 9781441961082. Falk, S., Römmele, A., & Silverman, M. (Eds.). (2017). Digital Government: Leveraging Innovation to Improve Public Sector Performance and Outcomes for Citizens. Cham: Springer. ISBN 978-3-319-38795-6. Chen, H. et al. (Eds.). (2007). Digital government: E-government research, case studies, and implementation, Vol. 17. Springer Science & Business Media. ISBN 978-0-387-71611-4. Nardo, M. et al. (2008). Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators: Methodology and user Guide. Paris: OECD Publishing. ISBN 978-92-64-04345-9. Perriam, J., & Carter, S. (Eds.). (2021). Understanding Digital Societies. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. ISBN 978-1-5297-3387-7.
Přílohy volně vložené
-
Přílohy vázané v práci
-
Převzato z knihovny
Ne
Plný text práce
Přílohy
Posudek(y) oponenta
Hodnocení vedoucího
Záznam průběhu obhajoby
The student presented the defense of the thesis with the title: Analysis of E-government and Digital Society Indicators in Selected Countries. The aim of the thesis is to analyse e-government and digital society indicators in selected countries.
Questions according to the assessment of the supervisor and reviewer of the thesis:
You decomposed e-government and digital society indices and rankings from 2022 (Table 3).
Which of these indicators do you think will have the greatest importance in the coming years, i.e., weight in the index?
What other indicators will occur in the coming years and will be incorporated into the structure of related indices, e.g., in relation to trends such as artificial intelligence, virtual reality, metaverse etc.?
Discuss your findings more in detail, i.e., are there any other indicators that are not included in existing.
The past year has brought many developments in the area of artificial intelligence. In your opinion, what are the possible developments in e-government ranking methodologies in this context? How might their composition and data collection methods change?
In the first decade of this century, studies of the development of e-government in European Union countries pointed to a major problem of the so-called usage gap, defined as the difference between high levels of provision and low levels of usage of digital services. What, in your opinion, are the reasons for the abandonment of measuring the usage gap in subsequent years?
The student responded to the committee's questions.