Dizertac?ni? pra?ce s na?zvem Etika ver?ejny?ch prostranstvi?: mezi z?ity?m a materia?lni?m prostorem, pr?edstavuje filozoficke? pr?i?stupy, ktere? reflektuji? podmi?ne?nost mezi prostr?edi?m z?ity?m (nehmotny?m) a vybudovany?m (materia?lni?m). Pra?ce nestavi? do kontrastu pouze vybrane? filozoficke? teze, ale i teorie s praxi?. Na konkre?tni?ch pr?i?kladech rozkry?va? jednotlive? vrstvy ver?ejne?ho prostoru a objasn?uje, co znamena? slovo ver?ejny? ve vztahu k prostorovy?m dispozici?cm. Dizertace stavi? na mys?lenka?ch Hannah Arendt, ktere? da?l rozvi?ji? teoriemi dals?i?ch myslitelu? jakou jsou Judith Butler, Michel de Certeau, Michel Foucault a Richard Sennett. Hlavni?mi vy?zkumne? ota?zky jsou formulova?ny na?sledovne?: Jak ver?ejny? je ver?ejny? prostor? Jakou roli hraji? ver?ejna? prostranstvi? v nas?ich z?ivotech? A jak ovlivn?uji? zpu?sob nas?eho vni?ma?ni? sve?ta?
Ani jeden z autoru? zmi?ne?ny?ch vy?s?e se ve sve? pra?ce neve?nuje vy?hradne? ver?ejne?mu prostoru. Ve sve?m vy?zkumu se doty?kaji? pouze urc?ity?ch aspektu?, ktere? tato pracuje abstrahuje, vrstvi? a spojuje do ucelene? teorie, jeji?z? ci?lem je zdu?raznit du?lez?itost ver?ejne?ho prostoru v nas?em z?ivote?, protoz?e pr?icha?zi? s tvrzeni?m, z?e ztra?ci?me nejen prostor samotny?, ale i jeho vy?znam.
Anotace v angličtině
The thesis The Ethics of Public Spaces: In Between the Built and Lived Environment
introduces different philosophical approaches, which elaborate upon the mutual conditionality
between the lived and the built environment. In addition, it contrasts those attitudes not only
with each other but also with real cases of active citizenship, interventions, and art in public
spaces. In the first chapter, the thesis poses a question of how public are public spaces and
what the notion of the public means in terms of built and lived environments, aligned with the
thoughts of Hannah Arendt. This part argues for the public as an active agency based on one's
perception of the common world. The second chapter stays with Hannah Arendt's ideas to dig
deeper into our public appearance as an essence for revealing our who-ness to others.
The author discusses there our mutual conditionality, invisibility, and body presence, as
introduced by Judith Butler, in relation to public appearance and puts it in contrast with
Arendt's thoughts.
To get a complete picture of the tension that appears within public spaces, the
following chapters discuss the concept of power using the thoughts of Michael Foucault and
his opponent, Michael de Certeau. Foucault shows how power turns inhabitants into subjects,
and de Certeau's perspective outlines how people resist it. The core of this chapter is about the
practices of everyday life that are tied to the built environment (such as walking) in order to
understand the political level of our everyday lives. In the last chapter, the author deliberately
shifts her focus from everyday life towards more visible events, such as the recent tearing
down of statues worldwide. The main task is to introduce the built environment as a carrier of
certain values, which can enhance the sense of belonging on the one hand; on the other, it can
be read as a form of an explicit exclusion from participation in public life, which prevents one
from dwelling with others.
Klíčová slova
veřejný prostor, pluralita, moc, občanský aktivismus, veřejná sféra, prostor jednání
Klíčová slova v angličtině
public spaces, citizenship, power, resistance, built environment, public realm,
space of appearance
Rozsah průvodní práce
-
Jazyk
AN
Anotace
Dizertac?ni? pra?ce s na?zvem Etika ver?ejny?ch prostranstvi?: mezi z?ity?m a materia?lni?m prostorem, pr?edstavuje filozoficke? pr?i?stupy, ktere? reflektuji? podmi?ne?nost mezi prostr?edi?m z?ity?m (nehmotny?m) a vybudovany?m (materia?lni?m). Pra?ce nestavi? do kontrastu pouze vybrane? filozoficke? teze, ale i teorie s praxi?. Na konkre?tni?ch pr?i?kladech rozkry?va? jednotlive? vrstvy ver?ejne?ho prostoru a objasn?uje, co znamena? slovo ver?ejny? ve vztahu k prostorovy?m dispozici?cm. Dizertace stavi? na mys?lenka?ch Hannah Arendt, ktere? da?l rozvi?ji? teoriemi dals?i?ch myslitelu? jakou jsou Judith Butler, Michel de Certeau, Michel Foucault a Richard Sennett. Hlavni?mi vy?zkumne? ota?zky jsou formulova?ny na?sledovne?: Jak ver?ejny? je ver?ejny? prostor? Jakou roli hraji? ver?ejna? prostranstvi? v nas?ich z?ivotech? A jak ovlivn?uji? zpu?sob nas?eho vni?ma?ni? sve?ta?
Ani jeden z autoru? zmi?ne?ny?ch vy?s?e se ve sve? pra?ce neve?nuje vy?hradne? ver?ejne?mu prostoru. Ve sve?m vy?zkumu se doty?kaji? pouze urc?ity?ch aspektu?, ktere? tato pracuje abstrahuje, vrstvi? a spojuje do ucelene? teorie, jeji?z? ci?lem je zdu?raznit du?lez?itost ver?ejne?ho prostoru v nas?em z?ivote?, protoz?e pr?icha?zi? s tvrzeni?m, z?e ztra?ci?me nejen prostor samotny?, ale i jeho vy?znam.
Anotace v angličtině
The thesis The Ethics of Public Spaces: In Between the Built and Lived Environment
introduces different philosophical approaches, which elaborate upon the mutual conditionality
between the lived and the built environment. In addition, it contrasts those attitudes not only
with each other but also with real cases of active citizenship, interventions, and art in public
spaces. In the first chapter, the thesis poses a question of how public are public spaces and
what the notion of the public means in terms of built and lived environments, aligned with the
thoughts of Hannah Arendt. This part argues for the public as an active agency based on one's
perception of the common world. The second chapter stays with Hannah Arendt's ideas to dig
deeper into our public appearance as an essence for revealing our who-ness to others.
The author discusses there our mutual conditionality, invisibility, and body presence, as
introduced by Judith Butler, in relation to public appearance and puts it in contrast with
Arendt's thoughts.
To get a complete picture of the tension that appears within public spaces, the
following chapters discuss the concept of power using the thoughts of Michael Foucault and
his opponent, Michael de Certeau. Foucault shows how power turns inhabitants into subjects,
and de Certeau's perspective outlines how people resist it. The core of this chapter is about the
practices of everyday life that are tied to the built environment (such as walking) in order to
understand the political level of our everyday lives. In the last chapter, the author deliberately
shifts her focus from everyday life towards more visible events, such as the recent tearing
down of statues worldwide. The main task is to introduce the built environment as a carrier of
certain values, which can enhance the sense of belonging on the one hand; on the other, it can
be read as a form of an explicit exclusion from participation in public life, which prevents one
from dwelling with others.
Klíčová slova
veřejný prostor, pluralita, moc, občanský aktivismus, veřejná sféra, prostor jednání
Klíčová slova v angličtině
public spaces, citizenship, power, resistance, built environment, public realm,
space of appearance
Zásady pro vypracování
-
Zásady pro vypracování
-
Seznam doporučené literatury
-
Seznam doporučené literatury
-
Přílohy volně vložené
-
Přílohy vázané v práci
-
Převzato z knihovny
Ne
Plný text práce
Přílohy
Posudek(y) oponenta
Hodnocení vedoucího
Záznam průběhu obhajoby
1) The supervisor introduces the candidate
2) The candidate introduces the thesis
3) The reviewers present their reports
4) The candidate responds to the main questions of the reviewers